The idea needs more shape before it's worth building. That's not a failure — that's the process. Go deeper on the problem and come back with a sharper take.
✓ Strong: 🔥 Real Problem (60%)↓ Weak: 📈 Signs of Demand (30%)
AU · Submitted April 18, 2026
The idea
“Claude Code skills that reverse-engineer visual design — explaining why a page feels the way it does, and how an animation actually works.
Screenshot a website you admire. Get back a style brief that traces every design choice to the feeling it creates. ”
Score breakdown — 6 dimensions
🔥 Real Problem6/10 (60%)
Does your idea solve something people actually struggle with?
⚡ Frequency & Pain6/10 (60%)
How often do people hit this problem — and how bad is it?
🎯 Who It's For3/10 (30%)
Can you picture exactly who would use this?
💪 Builder Fit6/10 (60%)
Do you actually get this problem from the inside?
📈 Signs of Demand3/10 (30%)
Is there any proof people want something like this?
❤️ Your Drive5/10 (50%)
Are you genuinely excited about building this?
About this score: Build Check validates startup ideas across 6 dimensions — Real Problem, Frequency & Pain, Who It's For, Builder Fit, Signs of Demand, and Your Drive. Scores reflect the founder's self-assessment at submission time.
🔥Available · First to sharpen it, owns it
Take this idea and sharpen it
Get the full AI deep-dive for this exact idea — delivered in ~30 seconds.